Good
morning, Friday. It's a pretty day in the city and looking forward to a nice
Easter weekend right here in New York. I may even convince David to take Khan
and I to Central Park on Sunday to check out New York's finest Easter fare- and
hats- my very favorite. And although I love seeing the city's most gorgeous
people out on sunny day in Manhattan, I'm feeling anything but festive.
I just finished
reading an article on Bloomberg entitled "Austin
is the new Brooklyn". This is not news for many of us (duh, of course it is)- loads of
ad types have gone out there, as well as lots of other types too seeking a less
expensive existence. And although New York's insane cost of living feels
particularly isolating, it's not just here that's feeling the burn- many
friends in LA are concerned about the price of living there, raising families
there, and getting by there. And I've still got some friends in Miami who talk
about how apartment prices (rentals too) are slowly creeping towards Manhattan
prices. Crazy. When I lived there (we left in 2011), it was quite the
affordable city- sure there were loads of options for rich people, but there
was also quite a bit available for the rest of us. It was one of the only
things I liked about living there.
According to the
piece, "Over the past three years, only three of the nation’s largest
cities—Dallas, Houston, and Atlanta—were among the 20 fastest-growing metro
areas of a million or more people. Austin topped the list, followed by San
Antonio, which lured 68,961 out-of-towners, and Raleigh, N.C., drawing 41,495.
Compare that with New York, which lost 362,359 residents, and Chicago, which
saw an exodus of 172,378. The Census data show that fracking boomtowns in North
Dakota and retirement enclaves in Florida have experienced some of the largest
growth in the nation by percentage, but the number of people moving to Austin
and other fast-growing cities far outpaces them. Frey says large cities won’t
necessarily miss the residents who’ve left, because new people are always
moving in to take their place: The March Census report found that despite the
outward migration, metro New York’s population is at a record high of
19.9 million"
So if you're
looking for New York to benefit from all of these people leaving, think again.
There will always be some rich dick to take your place. And that's inherently
the biggest bummer of all of this- the people that are leaving big cities in
droves are the very same people that give the city the plasma/style/creativity
it is so sorely lacking of late. These are not people leaving so they can live
a posh, suburban life in Greenwich. These are people who are young, with small
children, and most likely in creative fields or even more so, middle class
consumers who offer much to a city- from a great work ethic to contributions to
smaller and local. We shouldn't be losing these types of people. And nor should
your city- New York's loss is truly Raleigh's gain- but then of course, the
more New Yorkers move to a place, the more expensive it will become. I guess
you could call that the Brooklyn effect- there's a premium associated with what
was once staunchly middle class (small businesses, local bakeries, front
stoops) but is now highly upper class.
I for one don't
want to end up staying in this 1% ghetto if there's nobody fun to play with.
Everywhere you look in this city, there's an evaporation of what once was- sure
that's evolution, but walking around the Upper East Side yesterday, I saw
gorgeous brownstones off of 5th Avenue being completely gutted to serve the
whim of some hedge fund guy, who never got the memo about 2008, because
apparently, it never happened. How will we draw people here if nobody can
afford to live here?
To be clear, I
adore city life and have always been a big city kind of girl, but thinking my
notion of what living in a city is all about really needs to change- surely
there's other cities out there that feel less ridiculous and where I can live a
big cityish life? Now I know the truth about my spending- I don't have to take
Uber, I don't have to buy expensive makeup remover or eye cream, and I probably
don't need another pair of shoes. But living in New York as a monk is not
appealing either, and it would be nice to at least live somewhere where a glass
of wine doesn't cost $15. Sure, scaling down would make life more
accommodating here, but there are others here who don't buy a bunch of fancy
stuff and still can't make it. It's bullshit. I can't help but feel all of this
big city living has me craving something a bit smaller, and more manageable.
Not Austin (too indie). Not Miami (too plastic). Not Philly (just no). I'm open
to all other suggestions if you have them.
The good news in
all of this is that perhaps we will not all be slaves to this city anymore.
That maybe it will be possible to live somewhere else and have great culture,
diversity, and places to shop and eat. That is, until all the New Yorkers and
Los Angeles peeps come and price us out again. Sigh. It's tough out there for,
oh, 99% of us. I miss the opportunities that this city provided- it was never,
ever cheap to live here- but it was not like this. Here I am- stuck in
the middle, with ALL of you (or most of you). The rich really do ruin
everything. I'm tired of living in a city, and further, a country, where us vs.
them has replaced with liberty and justice for all. I wonder what the
rents are like in Europe these days? Wanna come with? On second thought, please
don't. I'd like to have a decent rent for a while or perhaps be able to buy a
house.
Cause that's what's
up this penny-pinching Friday in the overpriced 212. Yours, in sticker shock.
I'm not going anywhere right now, but if things keep going the way
they're going, I'm not so sure I want to get trapped in the rich ghetto. I'm still rooting for all of us who love this city, but living here is harder than ever... XO